AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Once they have this picture in mind, you can have a formal definition of the limit of the above sequence. They should now believe that the sequence is less than $1$ and can be made arbitrarily close to $1$. You can ask the students to mark these points on the "real" lineĪnd hopefully they draw something like the above. A simple example to start with would be say to consider a sequence John Morgan Allman, in his book "Evolving brains", claims that evolution has worked $1000$ times longer on our perceptual abilities than our symbolic-reasoning abilities. I believe "seeing" something pictorially enables the students to understand the key ideas succinctly and conveys to us a depth of understanding that a symbolic description cannot easily match. Instead of a symbolic definition, it is important to explain it pictorially, to begin with, and then move on to the "formal" version. I believe the problem with introducing limits is that the quantifiers might be confusing for students looking at it for the first time. You can apply the limit definition to try to find a $\delta$, but the catch-22 is that you need to ``know'' what the limit is before you can even interpret which points are in the $\varepsilon$-neighborhood. Thoughtful, informed students will know this logic needs to be run in reverse to constitute a proof, but there is at least a foothold for one to grab onto that original equation.īut when you are trying to find the limit of $x^2$ as $x\to 4$, if you don't have the intuition that the answer should be $16$, your work becomes very difficult. Even when doing something more technical, like verifying the trigonometric identity $\tan^2x + 1 = \sec^2x$, you can still start from what you're given and come up with the answer. This is often the first time students will have to consciously work ''forward'' to first convince themselves what the limit is before they can prove it.įor example, when you are solving $3x+4=5$ there is a mechanical list of procedures that one can go through to get to the answer. This is hardly surprising literally thousands of years of mathematics was done before anyone really found the need to understand them completely.Ī big problem with using the limit definition, is that it feels circular. To make matters worse, it's hard to describe a limit in a language that is precise enough to be useful to solve problems, but gentle enough to be swallowed easily. (And just when they think they understand, now they have to deal with uniform continuity, which to most will look exactly the same as continuity!) There are so many, and the order in which they are employed is so important, that it can be difficult to keep track of. As far as I see it, there are two massive obstacles that a classroom must overcome when trying to come to grips with formal limits.Ī big problem with understanding the limit definition, as you have pointed out, is the problem of quantifiers.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |